Performance Testing and Artificial Intelligence (½)
Summary
AI is becoming central in software delivery, but relying on it alone for performance testing can limit accuracy and real insight.
A balanced approach is needed: AI can help, yet human expertise remains essential for defining requirements, assessing risks, and understanding real system behaviour.
This first part of a two blog post serie compares the methodology of performance testers with the output produced by ChatGPT, focusing on requirements gathering and risk assessment.
A fictional application is used to evaluate how both approaches differ in depth, relevance, and business awareness.
The analysis shows strong overlaps but also highlights where AI oversimplifies or lacks contextual judgment.
Used wisely, AI strengthens performance testing—but replacing human reasoning is not realistic or effective.